Dr. Mark Nesselson, MD has an office at 146 West 95th Street, Suite 1A (Google Maps)
If you fake a vaccine record once, shame on you. If you fake a vaccine record twice, shame on you and everyone who helped you cover it up.
Advertisement
The New York Post reports that prominent Upper West Side pediatrician Dr. Mark Nesselson, practicing out of his office at 146 West 95th Street, is under investigation for faking a young child’s vaccination record to get them into public school … something he was also investigated for in 2007.
Back then, he paid a $10,000 fine, was monitored for 3 years, and still wouldn’t back down, saying, “For me, the central issue is the merit behind mandating immunizations so early.”
TRENDING: Man Dresses Up as MTA Employee, Sets Up Shop at Busy Intersection For Several Weeks
With the rise of Covid-19 vaccination fakery in addition to parents paying for medical exemptions for religious reasons, this is nothing new, but with more anti-vaccination mandate politicians like Lee Zeldin running for office, this trend is likely to only increase in the future. With this in mind, since Dr. Nesselson went on record opposing what he paid a fine for, is this new news really so shocking?
Recently, the father of one of Nesselson’s patients received an official form stating his daughter had received a vaccination on a day he knew she had not been to his office. He was also sent a form for insurance reimbursement showing his daughter had received the polio vaccine, as well as all other standard shots for toddlers, and that it was authorized by his daughter’s mother.
Advertisement
The Post verified this news when they received a copy of the letter that the distraught father sent to the State Office for Professional Medical Conduct back in March 2022. “It’s important that doctor’s act like doctors!” the father reportedly said to investigators.
We called Dr. Nesselson’s office and the woman who answered the phone initially said she didn’t know about the New York Post story, and then the line went silent for 30 seconds. When she came back on, she told us “he has no comment.” His office is currently not accepting new patients, according to its voicemail greeting.
Do the Covid “vaccines” even work?
“work” means 1-2 does, then you’re good for more than a decade, and won’t become infected with Covid 19.
That doesn’t make sense.
Ish Kabibble:
My error, I meant to write “doses”, not “does”. If that term correction doesn’t clear up your “confusion”, then I can’t help you further.
And the answer to my rhetorical question, which you didn’t understand: is No.
You write, “Do the Covid “vaccines” even work?”
Your comment is false and ignorant, especially your personal requirement that it be good for 1 to 2 decades. Some vaccines are good for life. Others like the one against flu need to be modified every year because the virus mutates and new vaccines directed agains the variant must be formulated. This is exactly what is happening with the vaccine against Covid.
The vaccines don’t prevent covid. They significantly reduce hospitalizations and deaths if you get it.
Ed,
The prevent hospitalization and death claims are anecdotal.
It is not anecdotal. Look at the hospitalization and death statistics pre and post-vaccine periods. The rates of hospitalizations and deaths were much higher pre-vaccine.
Ed,
There’s a fallacy in your logic.
You’re assuming improved treatment didn’t reduce death rates. But we know that treatments massively improved.
So, we don’t know that the “vaccines” reduce hospitalization and death. We guess, which is what you’ve done.
More interestingly, look at when Japan’s death rate declined massively; it was Sept. 1st 2021. So long after “vaccines”, but the week after Japan started recommending….
Um, who appointed you the person who gets to define what “works.”
The fact is that different vaccines have different effectivenesses depending on the specific viruses they prevent and how often those viruses mutate.
In the case of Covid it’s clear that the vaccines cut the likelihood of illness and almost 100% insure that if the virus breaks through it won’t lead to hospitalization or death.
Paul,
Don’t attempt to redefine the word “works” to defend the drugs.
They don’t work especially well, and wear off after about 6 weeks.
No physician should falsify medical records. Period.
Kit,
Right, however record changing (the charge) was not the subject of my comment. So by calling attention to what the Md did wrong, legally, you’ve attempted to distract from my point regards the Covid 19 “vaccines”.
I think you need to rephrase your comment that Zeldin is anti vaccine. You could say that he doesn’t agree that everyone needs the Covid vaccine and the Covid vaccine is not necessary for kids to attend school.
Did the front desk person just mess up the form? Happens all of the time at doctors offices
The problem is granting a monopoly on medical treatment to those doctors who are part of the mainstream consensus view. There was a time when doctors promoted cigarettes on television in the 50’s and part of the 60’s. Just like back then, doctors are being paid off by corporate interests–in this case the pharmaceutical companies to push vaccines. The conseensus view does not mean their theories are fact. We are living in a very disturbing climate when all those who question mainstrem medical theories are labledd as conspiracy theorists and spreading “medical misinformation.” No one group should have such a monopoly on medical theory or mode of treatment. Such authoritarianism on the part of government colluding with allopathic practitioners must stop!
Lewis:
And various governments, + the likes of Pfizer and Moderna, systematically altered the meaning of term “vaccine”, so as to include these drugs, which operate on very different, not widely tested until 2021, principles than vaccines.
These drugs are temporary variant specific immune stimulants, which clearly don’t prevent infection, or transmission of, the Covid 19 viruses.
Your comment about the Covid vaccines not being true vaccines is FALSE. They are pure vaccines and are an advance against older vaccines. Older ones act by stimulating the immune system with a pathogen protein that causes the immune system to develop antibodies and immune cells directed against the pathogen. Covid vaccines go one step further by using the genetic (RNA) make-up of the pathogen to allow our immune cells to use this RNA to develop antibodies and immune cells directed against the pathogen.
Your comment that this vaccines don’t prevent infection, or transmission of the Covid 19 viruses is intended to deliberately confuse people. Some people who are vaccinated may get a mild infection and may possibly transmit the virus (although this has never been shown to be true), the main message is that these vaccines prevent serious illness, hospitalization and death. The people now dying from Covid are those who have never been vaccinated. And they tend to be MAGA Republicans and people like you.
JerryV
Only if you redefine the term “vaccine”. You’re correct, the drugs are a type of genetic engineering, which is not how vaccines work.
It is not at all confusing that the drugs don’t prevent infection or transmission, as is the case with most real vaccines.
Some who are drugged have had quite serious cases.
The claim that the drugs prevent hospitalization and serious cases is anecdotal.
You really should check support evidence for your claims before posting.
I see you didn’t address my point about the “temporary” effectiveness of these novwl drugs base on largely untested technology.
This article is ridiculous. Many countries are banning the vaccine for young people. It isn’t necessary for children, does not stop the spread or even prevent infection, so it does not need to be mandated in the first place…for anyone. Second of all your point about Zeldin makes no sense. Someone should give this Dr an award for protecting children from myocarditis.
Ali:
Why doesn’t the point about Zeldin make sense?
It’s accurate to call Zeldin anti-vaccine mandate, and it’s hardly a radical supposition to say that in the future there will be increasing opposition to vaccine mandates, [especially ones that involve the whole population].
If you’d have read the article you’d have known it wasn’t just about the Covid vaccine. “He was also sent a form for insurance reimbursement showing his daughter had received the polio vaccine, as well as all other standard shots for toddlers, and that it was authorized by his daughter’s mother.”
Why doesn’t the point about Zeldin make sense?
It’s accurate to call Zeldin anti-vaccine mandate, and it’s hardly a radical supposition to say that in the future there will be increasing opposition to vaccine mandates, [especially ones that involve the whole population].
If it is true, after thorough investigation, his license should be suspended or even revoked.